Three Years On: Mentoring at the Department of Justice and the Public Prosecution Service of Canada

PDF Version

Table of Contents

List of Tables

  • Table 1: Number of Members of Employment Equity Group Registered in the NMP JUS and PPSC, March 31, 2011
  • Table 2: Gender of NMP Participants, JUS and PPSC, March 31, 2011
  • Table 3: Demographics of Survey Respondents, Associates and Mentors
  • Table 4: Whether respondents would recommend the NMP to others – Associates and Mentors
  • Table 5: Important issues and helpfulness of mentoring
  • Table 6: Extent that mentoring relationship affected various areas – Associates
  • Table 7: Extent that mentoring relationship affected various areas – Mentors
  • Table 8: Extent that mentoring relationship affected various areas – Associates
  • Table 9: Extent that mentoring relationship affected various areas – Mentors

Table of Figures

  • Figure 1: How respondents became aware of the NMP
  • Figure 2: The usefulness of NMP services – Associates
  • Figure 3: The usefulness of NMP services – Mentors
  • Figure 4: Satisfaction with NMP staff service – Associates
  • Figure 5: Satisfaction with NMP staff service – Mentors
  • Figure 6: Overall satisfaction with the National Mentoring Program
  • Figure 7: Associates' satisfaction with the matching process
  • Figure 8: Length of time in current mentoring relationship
  • Figure 9: Frequency of meetings
  • Figure 10: How associate and mentors meet
  • Figure 11: Length of meetings
  • Figure 12: Associates' satisfaction with progress toward achieving goals
  • Figure 13: Satisfaction with the mentoring relationship – Associates and Mentors
  • Figure 14: Length of time in mentoring relationship when it ended
  • Figure 15: Frequency of meetings – ended relationships
  • Figure 16: How associates and mentors met – ended relationships
  • Figure 17: Length of meetings – ended relationships
  • Figure 18: Satisfaction with ended mentoring relationship
Date modified: